One reason liberals are idiots when it comes to global warming

Discussion in 'Politics' started by gastropod, Jan 18, 2014.



  1. Because the stupidity displayed left him speechless. The fact that you repeat this and still don't understand that a world 1..6 degrees warmer does not mean there will never be no cold again is proof that you too are a moron.
     
    #31     Jan 21, 2014

  2. The fact that you repeat this and still don't understand that a world 1..6 degrees warmer does not mean there will never be no cold is proof that you too, along with all you other idiots who repeat such a breathtakingly stupid thing, are a moron.

    It truly boggles my mind how stupid you denier nitwits are.
     
    #32     Jan 21, 2014

  3. So you consider this post from fulcrum to be one with some value or insight?

    Not surprised. But this is about as intelligent as he ever becomes.
     
    #33     Jan 21, 2014

  4. The hockey stick chart has been proved by among others, Richard Mueller, previously a skeptic, his study with a team of physicists and mathematicians were partially funded by the Koch bros., who have declined to provide Dr. Mueller any more funding for some reason.


    To say the hockeystick chart is wrong is simply ignorant. To be polite.

    Stop reading right wing trash propaganda bullshit websites.
     
    #34     Jan 21, 2014
  5. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    Yes. I thought it was pretty damned funny as insults go. Much better than "You're an idiot! You're an idiot! You're an idiot" over and over again.
     
    #35     Jan 21, 2014
  6. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    ...a manipulated statistic for the sole purpose of creating alarm.
     
    #36     Jan 21, 2014
  7. maxpi

    maxpi

    I'm still trying to figure out what's eating FC... the left is an association of atheists, perverts, and brainless do-gooders so he's got to be one or more of those.
     
    #37     Jan 21, 2014
  8. OK, yeah, at least it was slightly humorous.

    As far as the idiot thing, well sorry, but sometimes you just have call a spade a spade. Virtually everything I have seen from the deniers here is idiotic and displays ignorance and just plain stupidity.
     
    #38     Jan 21, 2014
  9. I have taken the liberty of bolding, underlining and italiicizing a word in your post. That one word appears to be beyond FC's comprehension. I bet he still doesn't get why I linked him to "How to Lie with Statistics" That the "hockey stick chart is a statistic" appears to go beyond FC;s reasoning. If he actually looked that it is a chart of "Variants"...oh, well, a chart of absolutes instead of relatives would CLEARLY show no changes...but, those who have been suckered into the plan delineated in "The Report from Iron Mountain" would still be suckered in somehow!
     
    #39     Jan 21, 2014
  10. They're called confidence or probability intervals. To simply dismiss them because statistics are involved is brainless stupidity, something the deniers are very good at.


    http://www.livescience.com/21980-global-warming-skeptic-turnaround.html

    A prominent scientist who was skeptical of the evidence that climate change was real, let alone that it was caused by humans, now says he has made a "total turnaround." Richard Muller, a professor of physics at the University of California, Berkeley, says he has become convinced that "the prior estimates of the rate of warming were correct," and that humans are "almost entirely the cause" of that warming.

    Muller co-founded the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) team two years ago in order to independently assess what he viewed as questionable evidence of global warming. In a series of papers published last year, BEST presented their statistical analysis of 1.6 billion temperature reports spanning the last 200 years, controlling for possible biases in the data that are often cited by skeptics as reasons to doubt the reality of global warming.

    Their analysis indicated that global warming is real — that the average global land temperature has risen by 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit (1.4 degrees Celsius) since 1750, including 1.5 degrees F (0.9 degrees Celsius) in the past 50 years. The numbers closely agree with the findings of past studies by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), NASA and others; but finally, they were rigorous enough to satisfy Muller.

    [​IMG]


    Land and surface temperature from the Berkeley Earth average, compared to a linear combination of volcanic sulfate emissions and CO2 emissions. The large negative excursions in the early temperature records are likely to be explained by exceptional volcanic activity at this time. Similarly, the upward trend is likely to be an indication of anthropogenic changes.
     
    #40     Jan 21, 2014