Having initially begun the headline on its article "'Whistleblower' Exposed," RealClearInvestigations changed this to "How 'Whistleblower' May Be Outed" some two hours after first publication. So it is a maybe. Now, do you understand that even if the man is 'exposed' as what he reported was backed up by the transcript and others have said they were concerned the initial whistle-blower is not relevant anymore? That is not being cute or biased, just how it is.
Hunt that motherfucker down mercilessly and out him. If it turns out to not be him, then move on to the next lead until the swamp-spy is outed.
They sent him back to the CIA? Why not just fire him? Let him file a lawsuit and litigate it for years. At least he's not there undermining a duly elected president. I'm beginning to think a 50% cut in the budgets of the CIA, FBI, DOJ and State Departments is in order. Make it 90% for State.
I said, nah, I’m not going to—or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars. I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired.
is that a legal action biden took? i don't know, i'm askin' I said, nah, I’m not going to—or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars. I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired.