" On the plus side, Canada does have room for a shitload of deficit spending, once the perfect storm hits."
I'm one of the biggest free marketeers on the board. Especially in this forum. Our last argument you accused me of the same shit, where it was apparent you jumped the gun. Usually, I speak in most likely outcomes. Not what's optimal. What's optimal is exactly what you said - crash, deflate, reset, recover. Even if the US defaults, there's no way Harper or Carney will submit. I gave Locutus a nice lecture the other day on the inflationary impediments to recovery and why deflation was a good thing. Why do u always miss those posts but key in on the half-way ambiguous ones?
your words speak for themselves. there is no ambiguity. " On the plus side, Canada does have room for a shitload of deficit spending, once the perfect storm hits."
you spoke favorably of deficit spending. " On the plus side, Canada does have room for a shitload of deficit spending, once the perfect storm hits." you can't take back words. to satisfy your ego, when challenged, you respond with nonsense without an iota of proof.
no free marketeer would speak the way you do. "On the plus side, Canada does have room for a shitload of deficit spending, once the perfect storm hits."