98%-99% percent of a human DNA is common with a monkey. And while the origin of our existence can be traced to monkeys we are not monkeys. Genetic markers can be important in determining predisposition to certain diseases (sickle cell anemia) What ZOG implies is that there is some insurmountable mental divide that separates a white european from a black. That is a laughable concept. Ask any german whether he feels equality between himself and a romanian...
Here is the bottom line: US has a 99% literacy rate. This achievement would have seemed impossible back in 1800s. We have to thank public education for this. In the time that the founding fathers lived just being able to read would distinguish you from others. If you live in an environment where you see a black as nothing more than a brute your worldview is shaped accordlingly. But we do know that those "brutes" are more than capable of being educated therefore conclusions made in the 1800s concerning blacks are thoroughly inappropriate. I said it before and I say it again there is no insurmountable mental divide between an average black and a white. If it existed, blacks would not be able to read/write speak, etc. This is not up for debate or is somehow marxist. It is called reality. If a ditch digger from romania is "smarter" to you than a black college professor from USA you are simply an inbred. I am stil waiting for something constructive to appear out of mental midgets such as ZOG. How is a society supposed to be constructed? Should we abolish public education, segregate blacks, reinstitute slavery, fully implement "final solution"? Your viewpoints have nothing positive or actionable in them. That makes them worthless.
The Zionistsâ taboo -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By Paul J. Balles 8 March 2009 Paul J. Balles considers how Zionists in positions of authority at academic institutions in the United States are persecuting and defaming anyone who dares to criticize Israel or even mention Palestinian rights. About the worst thing one can do in America or Europe is to criticize Israel. âFreedomâ even in academia doesnât allow critical comments about Israel or Zionism. Those who risk it can lose their jobs and be labelled anti-Semitic bigots. Joel Kovel was terminated from Bard College after 20 years of service because of "differences between myself and the Bard administration on the issue of Zionism". The president of Bard, Leon Botstein, didnât consider Kovelâs critiques of Zionism to be protected academic freedom. The worst of the critic bashers is Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. He spearheaded a campaign against Norman Finkelstein' s tenure for writing Beyond Chutzpah, documenting in detail the falsifications in Dershowitz's book The Case for Israel. After being denied tenure, Finkelstein said: "I met the standards of tenure DePaul required, but it wasn't enough to overcome the political opposition to my speaking out on the Israel-Palestine conflict." In his 2008 book, The Case Against Israel's Enemies, Dershowitz defamed many who have been critical of Israel, calling them bigots or labelling them anti-Semitic. Dershowitz has led the pack attacking Israelâs critics. On former President Jimmy Carter, Dershowitz wrote: "Whatever the reason or reasons for Jimmy Carter's recent descent into the gutter of bigotry, history will not judge him kindly." Attacking University of Chicago Professor John J. Mearsheimer and Harvard University Professor Stephen M. Walt, who together authored The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy (2007), Dershowitz wrote: "They are hate-mongers who have given up on scholarly debate and the democratic process in order to become rock-star heroes of anti-Israel extremists." Writing about the British University and College Union (UCU) boycott of Israeli educators and academic institutions, Dershowitz explained how he and others "wrote an op-ed piece for the Times of London, in which we demonstrated parallels between this boycott and previous anti-Jewish boycotts that were undoubtedly motivated by anti-Semitism" . On another front, Roosevelt University of Chicago at Illinois fired a philosophy and religion professor for allowing students in his class to ask questions about Judaism and Islam. The chair of the department, Susan Weininger, fired the professor, Douglas Giles, saying that students should not be allowed to ask whatever questions they want in class. Weininger said that free discussion in world religions could "open up Judaism to criticism". Any such material, she said, was not permissible to be mentioned in class discussion, textbooks or examinations. Further, she ordered Giles to forbid any and all discussion of the "Palestinian issue", any mention of Palestinian rights, the Muslim belief in the holiness of Jerusalem, and Zionism. When Professor Giles refused to censor his students, Weininger fired him. One of the worst types of Zionist harassment involves cases of Muslims generally and Palestinians in particular for speaking out on behalf of their favourite causes. The US government has often been complicit in these cases. One such case involves Dr Sami Al-Aryan who taught computer engineering at the University of South Florida before his arrest in 2004. Al-Arian was charged with raising money and otherwise assisting Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a group the US government declared a terrorist organization in 1995. At trial in 2005, he was acquitted on eight of 17 counts, and the jury deadlocked on the other counts. All counts were trumped up by Zionist prosecutors who wanted to silence Al-Aryan. If anything could vaguely approach justice in this case, the Israelis who have been slaughtering Palestinians for half a century would have been labelled terrorists and brought to trial for committing much worse deeds than Al-Aryan. The gravest injustice allows Zionists to silence honest critics for violating the Zionist taboo. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul J. Balles is a retired American university professor and freelance writer who has lived in the Middle East for many years. For more information, see http://www.pballes. com. Copyright © Redress Information & Analysis. All rights reserved. http://members5.boardhost.com/medialens/msg/1236508130.html
Free speech does not cover things which incite strife. When you go on whitecivilrights.com and you see articles that plainly state that Obama is an agent of israel (total bs for morons) you have an article that is slandering the US head of state/government and is discrediting him. Things on whitecivilrights.com and equivalent sites offer nothing positive or constructive. Mental midgets such as ZOG operate on the same level.
When you state or imply that a US politician is an agent of a foreign state you are essentially accusing that person of TREASON People get executed for that. I have never seen a person with a solid grasp of history of western interventionism in the middle east suggest that US does israel's bidding. I could go on and on about how arab nationalism was stroked by great britain to undermine ottoman empire during wwi, how it became a headache afterwards, how the needs of the cold war and the need to counter pan arabic nationalism guided US foreign policy in the middle east. But in order to understand all that a person needs a brain.
People like JP Morgan, or Goldman&Sachs, Lehman Brothers don't fit nicely into the "jewish conspiracy to make the world red". I mean the rotschild family was the very antithesis of communism. That lenin was able to take over russia was due to german sponsorship, wwi and incompetence of nicholas II. Russia was a place where pogroms were commonplace. Had those not occurred, perhaps there would be a faction of jews with aims opposite to lenin/trotsky.
ZOG could really be Pabst's alter ego. Or alter ego of some other conservative nutcase. Mr. 97 posts seems fishy. Moderators should investigate the ip of zog and if it matches any other member ban on sight.
ZOG. I personally concede every point that you make. My question is, so what? In the info age, whatever interests someone, they can find the info. People do not care if there is some great conspiracy if their needs are being met. A white girl does not care about "mud people" if her man is laying the pipe like no tommorrow. White guys do not care about "niggers" being "inferior" if those "niggers" make good co-workers. The only people who care about such things is people who have no control and are trying to find ways to get some control over their lives. So what are you and Mag missing?? The Jews run it all. And?? What is your point????
Geithner identifies himself as Jewish on his Facebook information. He also grew-up in Brooklyn and then Scarsdale. Not exactly goyim strongholds. His wikipedia profile ALSO listed him as Jewish-until his personal information was deleted a few weeks ago. I had to use a cache because you can't access his Facebook info directly without being on his friends list. http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache...sh&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=38&gl=us&client=firefox-a