Poll: Is Obamacare good or bad for Americans?

Why do you assume he's not paying into his country's health insurance?

 

It's good for the USA because it will help us to declare bankruptcy sooner (we're already bankrupt), so that we can print new currency (if it isn't already printed and being stored) and get on the gold standard.

 

It could be, though, that Obama might implement some cost cutting measures such that our declared bankruptcy could be delayed.

Like for example, he might declare that anyone over 50 will be refused treatment at medical facilities inside the USA.

Of course, his family, congress and staffers and their families will be exempted.

 

Don't laugh, he changes Obamacare as he sees fit.
Constitutionally, he can do that.

I'm talking about the Obama version of the constitution.

 

All pure speculation now. Let's see how it works over next 5 years at least.

 

yet people in the Obama's political base don't realize Obamacare would make them poorer. though Mr. Obama is going around country to tell American people that he's bringing the good thing to them, but in reality, Obamacare brings burden to Americans and businesses.

1) it imposes financial burden and fines on businesses. it would make it more expensive to run business in the US.

2) it also impedes on growth of many businesses (the 40-45 workers requirement). As you know how important small businesses is to the US economy.

2) At personal level, If you don't comply with Obamacare, you’ll be hit with new tax penalties and possibly, jail time.

if one doesn't have the need for something, government shouldn't force him or her to buy it.... Self-reliance and discipline will make America strong as a nation!

if you have time, drop Mr. Obama a line to tell him how you feel about the Obamacare.

http://www.whitehouse.gov

 

You have reason to believe it will/can work out better than all the other federally <s>managed</s> fucked up programs?

 

Why should be we want to give 5 minutes, no less 5 years to an UNCONSTITUTIONAL, government created law, forcing us to buy a product from a third party, when the democrat who wrote the law calls it a train wreck?

 

Why do we need to upend the whole system for 650,000 people with preexisting conditions.
I am sure there is a simpler way to do this.
_____________________
Another Democratic analysis, released last fall by Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), then the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said that between 2007 and 2009, the nation's four largest private health insurers denied coverage to about 650,000 people based on their medical history.
______________________

 

650,000 is about 0.2% of the population. Hosing everybody is not the solution.