It's just a pic that's been around for a while. If some people find it attractive, that's their issue, not mine. I find it telling that you ignored my comments on the article itself. Seems to me that's the far more reasonable criticism of Rolling Stone. If the article told us nothing new, what was the point?
1st... of all comparing Obama to Bush indicts Obama it does not make him look better. Its like comparing yellow puke to green puke. 2nd... in that list of bombings were there coverups. was it alleged bush did not send in resources when they wer need over a 8 hour period or longer. Was there are problem interviewing witnesses. its not the attack its the coverup.
Don't talk out of your ass and pretend like it's my problem. The bottom line is this: how can you be outraged (or feign outrage) over Benghazi and not be outraged by this:
Nor the U.S. Ambassador to the country who was doing something mysterious as the consulate. Why doesn't the left want to know what was happening at Benghazi? Why can't Congress talk to the people who were there? Some posters here are incredibly naïve. I hope they aren't old enough to vote because they aren't responsible enough to have that power.
Why don't they want the survivors talking? Well, that's an easy one. These Americans were ambushed and over run by terrorists, and when they begged and pleaded for help, this tyrant and his gestapo basically told them to go get fucked as he wasn't going to piss off the muslims with a counter strike. This story makes watergate look like a fly on the wind shield, yet, NOTHING will be done about it!!! Hitler could do whatever he wanted to do too with zero consequences...
So says the roofer as he tumbles to the driveway on his head once again. Scoop those brains into a thimble and put them back in, brokenarrow.