this article was originally posted on Forbes before the company got too much heat and removed it because the Covid Cult came for them. Thankfully, its still out there to be retrieved. Aug 18, 2021,08:30am EDT|5,692 views School Mask Mandates Mean Trauma For Millions Of Children, Especially Those From Low-Income Families Zak Ringelstein Contributor Education Teacher. Founder of Zigazoo & UClass. Columbia's Teachers College. I have spent my career as an educator fighting standardized testing and the havoc it has wreaked on the mental health and well-being of American schoolchildren, especially kids from low-income families. Before the Covid-19 pandemic, our years of activism were finally paying off and popular legislation across the country was just starting to roll back draconian high-stakes exams, citing the harm it does to the psychology, health, and academic performance of America’s schoolchildren. Instead of desks in a row, they recommended round tables. Instead of multiple choice assignments, they recommended collaborative projects. Instead of punitive discipline, they recommended mindfulness and socio-emotional learning. The future looked bright for a free, liberal education for all children. It seemed that finally it wouldn’t just be rich families who could afford to opt out of restrictive test-based academic settings. That was until Covid-19 reached America’s shores and overnight transformed the American public education system into something unrecognizable: a system of restrictions and mandates far more repressive than standardized testing ever was. Students in most American classrooms now must wear a covering over their face and stay distanced from their peers the entire school day. In many schools, students are forced to play by themselves during recess. Even for the youngest of school children, desks are in rows. Kids can’t see each other’s smiles or learn critically important social and verbal skills. The phrase I hear repeated over and over again to justify masks is: “kids are resilient.” But as an elementary school educator and Ph.D. student at Columbia University trained in trauma-informed instruction, I am concerned that this statement is overly simplistic and misleading. What we should be saying is: “masks and social distancing induce trauma and trauma at a young age is developmentally dangerous, especially for children who are experiencing trauma in other parts of their lives.” Every year of a child’s early life lays the foundation for their adulthood and insecure foundations do, in fact, crumble. According to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, children without assurance of their personal security (e.g. social anxiety from masks and social distancing) are often incapable of making social connections and may have difficulty building intimate relationships in their lives. Neurological research demonstrates that kids who experience this kind of fear and trauma at a young age undergo structural and functional restructuring of their prefrontal cortex, resulting in emotional and cognitive processing problems. This trauma is especially concerning for children growing up in poverty who often have the compounding effect of other trauma at home or in their community. Before Covid-19, already nearly half of all American children had experienced trauma in their lives. Furthermore, children in masks who are socially distanced are more likely to lead a sedentary lifestyle at school and home, and therefore are also more likely to become both obese and depressed. Obesity disproportionately affects children from low-income backgrounds and can lead to lifelong health challenges that often lead to early death. Tragically, the prevalence of clinical depression and anxiety have already doubled for children globally since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and will likely worsen with continued restrictions. Children in masks are also likely to miss out on critical language development, another fundamental area of growth in early years where children from low-income backgrounds already have disproportionate disadvantages. Covid-19 cases among children have increased due to the Delta variant, but according to the American Academy of Pediatrics, “0.00%-0.03% of all child COVID-19 cases resulted in death” this past week. Despite sensationalized clickbait news coverage, a child’s current chance of death from Covid-19 in America is lower than their chance of dying from a lightning strike, choking on food, or a car accident. We should keep watching the data to monitor whether children experience morbidity and mortality worse than they currently do, and adjust as is appropriate. But we must ask ourselves: do the benefits of masks and social distancing truly outweigh the long-term psychological, physical, social, and academic harm we are inflicting on a whole generation of American schoolchildren? If we care about equity and the most vulnerable members of our society, we at least can’t be afraid to ask.
Amusing - go read the paper from respected researchers. the paper is being submitted for publication and peer review -- this is the pre-print. They include the paper and a powerpoint describing the results. Yet you have nothing to say about the many other papers -- let's provide a reminder. Mask Use and Ventilation Improvements to Reduce COVID-19 Incidence in Elementary Schools — Georgia, November 16–December 11, 2020 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7021e1.htm Research Finds Masks Can Prevent COVID-19 Transmission in Schools “With masking, the schools clearly can safely deliver face-to-face education for children and adults" https://today.duke.edu/2021/06/research-finds-masks-can-prevent-covid-19-transmission-schools As well as - Research done in North Carolina, Wisconsin, Utah and Missouri has shown mask mandates effectively stymie coronavirus transmission rates in schools
Maybe Forbes removed the article when it was pointed out it was complete nonsense in regards to low income children and masks. The reality -- the best thing to do for low-income children is to keep them in school learning in a in-person environment engaged with the teachers. If mask allow in-person learning without having to go remote due to Covid cases then this is the best thing for children.
Not peer-reviewed. You've said it before. If its not peer-reviewed, its not worth it. Of course, unless it says what you want it to.
Yet you have nothing to say about the many other papers -- let's provide a reminder. Mask Use and Ventilation Improvements to Reduce COVID-19 Incidence in Elementary Schools — Georgia, November 16–December 11, 2020 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7021e1.htm Research Finds Masks Can Prevent COVID-19 Transmission in Schools “With masking, the schools clearly can safely deliver face-to-face education for children and adults" https://today.duke.edu/2021/06/research-finds-masks-can-prevent-covid-19-transmission-schools As well as - Research done in North Carolina, Wisconsin, Utah and Missouri has shown mask mandates effectively stymie coronavirus transmission rates in schools
I commented on both other studies. Maybe read a little of the thread before spouting off? For the first, I asked if this was coming from the same CDC that said mask wearing wasn't effective. for the second, I pointed a whole bunch of comments about how they looked ONLY at schools wearing masks. You can't exactly do a good study if you don't study the other side of the argument. This is like, first grade analysis.
Yet you ignore studies which compare schools which mask and don't mask. Here's a reminder... Mask Use and Ventilation Improvements to Reduce COVID-19 Incidence in Elementary Schools — Georgia, November 16–December 11, 2020 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7021e1.htm