Strawman. It is you making the extravagant claims about supernatural beings, not atheists. And by "prove the claim", I meant to a reasonable person's standards, like in a courtroom. Many things don't need "absolute" proof to be believable, but they nonetheless need evidence. Where is the evidence for your god? Why are you so afraid to explain why you believe?
The "big bang" as described and claimed was a supernatural event... It was not a natural event, as nature (a major part of the universe) did not exist... "And by "prove the claim", I meant to a reasonable person's standards, like in a courtroom." ...uhhhh, sure you did. LMAO... Now science has been reduced to a jury's opinion... Too freaking funny...
Odd how you still demand this "convincing evidence" but are dumbfounded and perplexed at defining it. TRY AGAIN
This is where your argument completely falls apart. Most atheists don't hold your strawman hypothesis that "there is no god." We simply maintain that your god is unimportant because there's no evidence-based reason to believe it even exists. You seem to be incapable of understanding the difference between not having a belief in existence and having a belief in nonexistence. Sad.
No where near as odd how you still refuse to provide any "convincing evidence". One could reasonably assume that you have none at all, and that you believe in your god for purely childish reasons.
Why are you incapable of accepting the answers you've been given? More to point, why are you incapable of providing any evidence at all?
You are merely playing a semantics game and EVERYONE I MEAN EVERYONE KNOWS IT INCLUDING YOU. I simply ask you what proof, evidence etc etc would you accept to change your assertion on the subject?
LIAR, of course it's important to you. How many pages have you posted on this thread. What about this one http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=184586 Forget about those missives too? SAD INDEED