Hit the column area, yet still, say 10 per column, 2 columns, at least 3 rows of colums, 60 rockets in total. (Would take less per column but still, precision isn't 100% accurate) And that's at the very least. Maybe the bridge of Crimea is the only worthy strategic object. (If we got such expenses in mind) At the same price, say 100 of Himars rockets, where we could use it with higher efficiency ? More ammo deposits storages / warehouses ? P.s. Iran using their arses instead of the brain. Strike while the beast is hurt. Catch Putin once he landed. Give him to EU/US for tribunal. Gain Russians as the enemy. Move from enemy of the west into potential ,,friend" zone.
Ideally, you take out the ammo sites and then clip the bridges that the resupply would have to cross over. Quite a bit of work going on in that area so that is for the good. Quite so.
Ruskies not happy with "some kind of sh*t." Yeh, well. Sh*t happens. Russians have so few troops left, they make one battalion out of three intercepted call Quote: "Two days ago it flew into the building. They fire some kind of sh*t, you hear f**k-all when it’s coming out... Just two seconds - bam. Some kind of MLRS, like a Grad or Uragan. Only it’s silent. Everything they say on TV about our losses being minimal, that’s all crap." https://www.yahoo.com/news/russians-few-troops-left-one-134417841.html