TAPE READING (chat room cont.)

Discussion in 'Strategy Building' started by shortseller, Sep 30, 2005.

tape reading

Poll closed Jan 28, 2006.
  1. go long at bid

    19 vote(s)
    20.9%
  2. go long at offer

    38 vote(s)
    41.8%
  3. place short at bid (bullet or conversion) reg sho.

    17 vote(s)
    18.7%
  4. place short at offer

    17 vote(s)
    18.7%
  1. Just FYI, I've seen specialist or floor broker reserve orders showing 10k... and sometimes when they start showing less than 10k that's the end of the order.

    Usually they game it though, and continue to refresh after decrementing the display size.
     
    #531     Mar 30, 2008
  2. What was the stock? I bet it was a large-cap one, in small/mid cap they use to just satisfy minimum 1k to display, and when NYSE reduced min size to 1 lot, the spec/floor brokers were more than happy...
     
    #532     Mar 30, 2008
  3. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    #533     Mar 30, 2008
  4. cookding

    cookding

    Hi Mav,

    I am interested in your comment above: "At best all you can do is determine relative strength and weakness and perhaps some sort of level where you think there is support and weakness."

    Can you kindly comment on what approach should one take to accomplish that from the standpoint of tape reading the futures such as ES? Thank you for your help.

    Regards,
    cook
     
    #534     Jun 10, 2008
  5. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Cook, like I said in my post, you can't really tape read the futures. I think your best approach with futures is to locate key levels and observe how the market reacts to those levels. My favorite is watching how the market reacts to news. It always amazes me how many people try to short the maket on bad news/good action. To me, that is the easiest long in the world and vice versa, good news/bad action.

    You see oil up 5 bucks and a bad CPI number and the spoos are down 2 handles on the open. There is a lot of information on that open and it's not telling you to get short. You can also look at the key levels. Take 1400 in the spoos. When we traded there to the upside on our way to 1440 I was shocked how many guys were trying to sell 1400. We got to 1400 and gently came off that level a few times while getting the worst news every single day. We should have been coming off hard on that level but we kept holding and holding and holding. If that wasn't a long signal, I don't know what is. Yet so many people were calling double tops, fib retracements, round number, etc.

    You can tell a lot about price action you just have to look at the bigger picture and not get caught up in absolute levels. That's one of the key differences in listed stocks. Stocks actually had price levels you could trade off of. Actual prints. Futures are way too noisy. The spoos could be selling off on real weakness or they could be getting sold because there is a large buyer in the Russell who is spreading sales off in the spoos. Or there could be a large hedge fund that just bought 10k puts to hedge a position and he cleared out the book on the spoos and pushed the market lower temporarily. Like I said, much more sloppy. So you need to step back and widen your levels and not get too wrapped up in absolute prices.

    That's the best advice I can offer. And don't forget to trade the reactions! It's not the news that matters but how the market reacts to it.
     
    #535     Jun 11, 2008
  6. cookding

    cookding

    Thanks for the advice Mav!
     
    #536     Jun 12, 2008
  7. Eleanor

    Eleanor

    Just skimmed through this thread, am just curious because wouldn't context override all when it comes to tape reading? Meaning that, price action "x" in say crude oil after a bullish inventory report would portend the exact opposite of price action "x" after a bearish inventory report? So if one doesn't have the relevant information ie proper context then price action is basically useless or misleading?

    Futhermore, if a simple thing such as a large bid size normally inferred future weakness, then can't you project such a principle of deception further out over time/price to say that large declines are usually preceded by short-term show false strength and vice versa?
     
    #537     May 16, 2009
  8. gaj

    gaj

    got pointed to this thread. i don't often trade nyse stocks, and virtually never trade the big boys on the nasdaq. so my methods aren't completely universal...

    however, i've found many of the things that maverick and steve said in the first couple pages of this thread to ring true, even on the naz stocks i trade. (i flock to where there's unusual activity).

    another thing - if stock takes out an established low level, SHOULD break down hard, a size bid comes in and the stock doesn't even attempt to chip away at it - watch out for the reversal!

    anyhow, thanks to those posters from early on. i'm going to read the rest of this thread, but it's got some great tips on the first few pages that i would never have understood until i experienced them, over and over again, when trading..
     
    #538     Sep 25, 2009
  9. TGpop

    TGpop

    when is the NYSE going fully electronic anyway?
     
    #539     Oct 4, 2009
  10. seems pretty obvious and saw someone else say the same thing. go long at 100.01 and get out when it goes below 100. that is the answer.
     
    #540     Oct 4, 2009