And here it comes, trying to change the topic. How typical of a right-wing Russian propagandist, when he can't win a debate on its merits, he will use the oldest debating tactic known to man - just change the topic. Thread is about dumb right wingers equating Marxism to things they don't like, try to stay on topic.
"Teaching college classes to survive"? You think he's struggling? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Reich Again, what is your point?
Absolutely agree, but the limits are reached when kids without clear conscience are indoctrinated through participation in those shows that often times use extreme vulgarity and nudity. There is no excuse that parents should make those choices because we also have limits and guidelines in place that supersede the decision making power of parents
My point? A through and through left winger who did very little to nothing to make economics fairer for the middle class during all the stints at various administrations. You would think that he amassed a comfortable nestegg during his decades of work yet his own home looks like he is collecting welfare. How fitting for a socialist. He did very little to make real changes happen yet spends his entire remaining life to critique conservatives. (though I fully agree with him on his stance on Trump and his past administration of nepotists) My point is that he is a hypocrite.
How fascinating. Please tell me more of this parallel universe from which you hail. Because the Robert Reich in this universe has some serious credentials and an impressive resume. Perhaps you'd like to compare yours with his? And you know what his home looks like?
I would call them Racist Democrats Conservative philosophy would never allow Government to control society to a Jim Crow level. only a democratic philosophy could allow that much institutional control
I probably know more about him and his personal life and convictions than you do. Economics is what I have done and devoted my life to for 35 years. Reich was and is always great at speaking and his talking points sound enticing for the middle class. Problem is that he did very little to nothing when he was at the helm. And given how much he claims to know about economics he seemed to have applied very little of that knowledge to building his own retirement safety net. Hard to convince others when you yourself fail at the same thing yourself.
It's historic fact and evidenced that a majority of them were democrats. No need to argue with deniers.
You just clearly made my point but are too stupid to realize it. The entire argument comes from the "its none of your business what i do in my bedroom", which was default gay argument up to about 10 years ago. Its a valid argument and with a few expectations, no one really cared. We shifted from that to "I am going to tell you exactly what I do my bedroom and YOU BETTER ACCEPT IT OR ELSE!!!!!". Why are straight people being forced to participate in Gay Pride? Can you answer that?
Who said you can't? Problem is you want to ignore what they self identified as aka CONSERVATIVES because you yourself are one and want to pretend that Conservatives are not racists. I am a conservative. I intend to give the American people a clear choice. I welcome a fight between our philosophy and the liberal left-wing dogma which now threatens to engulf every man, woman, and child in the United States. I am in this race because I believe the American people have been pushed around long enough and that they, like you and I, are fed up with the continuing trend toward a socialist state which now subjects the individual to the dictates of an all-powerful central government...I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever.- Democrat George Wallace Do you call Trump, Reagan or Rick Perry Democrats too because they were registered Democrats in the past?