During the primaries Trump constantly accused the media of not showing the crowds he was pulling. Now when they do show the crowds, the guy flips off into a tantrum.
Weren't your friends in the media always ignoring the crowds trump drew and only now, in this one case, finding it important? Who do you write jokes for?
Crowds don't necessarily determine voter turnout. In any event, and for what it's worth as far as this exchange is concerned, keep in mind that Clinton actually got more votes. Besides, it was Trump who began making a big deal about the inauguration attendance and the "fake" news regarding it. We're just amused, and not in a good way, about Trump's and his press secretary's bald-faced lies about it. What you should be asking is Who writes their fictitious material?
The founders of the US set up the republican form of gov't we enjoy specifically to keep majorities in large states from controlling the gov't. This last election worked exactly how they planned it. They wanted it this way and they codified it into the constitution. But I don't expect the lawless left to ever accept the law when it isn't on their side, so I'm not surprised at your unwillingness to accept the law and it's consequences.
Pay attention. That wasn't the context of the discussion. Our discussion was limited to crowds and voter turnout; photos and lies about them.
Whatever the crowd size was, it won't stop Trump from being a great leader regarding climate change. He is going to be great.
Hopefully under Trump, we are able to pump enough carbon into the atmosphere that futurecurrents goes extinct.