To be fair this is partially due to the increasing number of retirees compared to a smaller number of younger people entering the workforce.
U.S. Unemployment: Retirees Are Not The Labor Exodus ... www.forbes.com/.../u-s-unemployment-retirees-are-not-the-labor-...Forbes Jan 15, 2014 - If the labor force participation rate had held steady at its 2008 level, ...people retiring en masse, younger people failing to enter the work force, or both? ...If, however, younger Americans are not entering the labor force and/or ... Older Adults Staying in Labor Force Longer Means Younger ... www.usnews.com/.../older-adults-staying-in-l... U.S. News & World Report Oct 3, 2014 - “What we see is people thinking they were going to retire on the appreciated ... They're staying in the labor force longer and in part that's stalling that roll up ... Older adults also might be re-entering the workforce after retiring.
Please go on thinking I am Atticus. As I said, it's an extreme compliment. But a moderator can confirm if you really would like. Magna or Baron, for example, could show you that you're the idiot we all knew you were.
Covertibility? Did you want to prove your assertion? Or did you run off to read your email talking points?
You seem to be totally addicted to fight with others ...starting to talk to yourself. Should turn out to be quite a bit of fun arguing with yourself.
Not sure which part you stubbornly want to misunderstand. I agreed with you and concluded that you can't be him. Which part itches you now?
You said "you can't possibly be you". Not "him". But if you weren't being sarcastic and it's just another grammatical error, then point clarified.
It's your grammatical error dummy. Subject of your original post was Atticus. I replied that it [Atticus] can't be you. Lived too long in the South Florida Latino hood?